Leaders from both academia and business agree that the best way to foster innovation in science and technology is by getting researchers, business and startups working together.
We’ve prepared this two-part Relationship Guide to canvass the issues and promote the assistance and support available to researchers who want to interact more closely with industry. Read Part 1 here.
Businesses look to universities and research institutes for new knowledge that can help them scale up and innovate their products and services. By accessing the latest research findings, businesses of all kinds can improve their efficiency and profit. At the same time, researchers can create sustainable jobs, novel solutions and global pathways for their knowledge. While there’s robust support available to facilitate research-business relationships, it can be hard for a business to find the knowledge they need. Cultural differences and misunderstandings can also get in the way.
Get out of your bubble!
The best way for researchers to find new opportunities is by networking, knocking on doors and telling others about their discoveries. There will be no collaborative opportunities for those that can’t be found and the new commercial engagement KPIs attached to federal research funding provide strong incentives for all academic researchers to widely communicate the value and potential of their work.
It’s all in the timing
Academics might resist the faster timeframes imposed by businesses seeking knowledge input in order to take a product to market, but unless researchers are prepared to respond to commercial timeframes and develop a sense of urgency, there’s a chance that opportunities will pass them by. No matter how closely a research project aligns with a commercial product, the early bird will get the worm.
Universities are increasingly supporting students and academics to acquire the skills they need to explore commercial opportunities, with assistance provided by way of incubators, accelerators, short courses and government support. Learn more about some of the initiatives that help facilitate and accelerate research-business partnerships: Tech Connect, AMSI Intern, CSIRO’s ON, Cicada Innovations and Data 61’s Ribit and Expert Connect platforms.
Don’t rely on government support
While a broad range of government support is available to help researchers get started, Appen founder Dr Julie Vonwiller warns that to succeed, a product must be able to stand alone on its own merit in a marketplace without the need for ongoing subsidies.
Publish or perish?
There’s often a tension between publishing and protecting knowledge with IP, but patent attorney Dr Gavin Recchia says it’s all about getting the timing right.
It’s a team sport
Business owners Dr Alan Taylor and Dr Julie Vonwiller say the entrepreneurial journey requires a vast array of skills and talents and innovation all the way along as a business evolves.
Leaders from both academia and business agree that the best way to foster innovation in science and technology is by getting researchers, business and startups working together.
We’ve prepared this two-part Relationship Guide to canvass the issues and promote the assistance and support available to researchers who want to interact more closely with industry.
As part of the 2017 Spark Festival, Inspiring Australia NSW hosted a forum to explore what it would take to create more value from publicly funded knowledge.
Participants discussed what needs to change in universities to better prepare researchers for the future.
The 2017 Global Innovation Index ranks Australia 23rd in the world, behind China, New Zealand, Hong Kong and Singapore. While Australia is placed 10th in terms of “knowledge workers” it scores a low 52nd for innovation linkages and 48th for knowledge absorption. This is despite our ranking in the top 10 worldwide for innovation input – infrastructure, human capital, market sophistication and education.
So what’s not working in our research-business relationships and how can we fix it?
Changing the culture
With the next generation of STEM researchers often being trained by academics who lack the expertise, training and knowledge to commercialise research knowledge, there’s a pressing need for universities to think more innovatively about education and industry engagement. Even when an opportunity does not exactly align with a researcher’s particular interests, there may still be collaborative partnerships to explore.
Moving between academia and industry
When microbiologist Dr Dharmica Mistry left academia to enter industry, she felt like she was jumping to the dark side and abandoning a research career forever. The founder and Chief Scientist at BCAL Diagnostics, a biotech company commercialising a blood test for breast cancer screening, would like academics to be able to move more freely between the academic and commercial worlds.
Communicating is not a hobby
Dr Noushin Nasiri develops novel sensors that can detect disease in human breath. When the post doctorate researcher began talking publicly about her research and its application as an affordable, nanoscale diagnostic device, four industry partners made contact to explore commercial opportunities. But communicating research, she says, is still seen as a hobby.
A shared vision
Professor Veena Sahajwalla says that in order to develop commercialisation outcomes, it is critical for researchers to be able to both articulate the value and potential application of their work and also to understand the needs of the industry partner and their vision for the future.
Business can access research knowledge
AusIndustry Innovation Facilitator Gary Colquhoun helps Australian businesses identify opportunities for research collaboration to address their knowledge gaps in all kinds of ways, driving business innovation and creating a positive impact on the economy.
Shelley Copsey leads New Ventures and Commercialisation at Data61 and is working with research startups to help them develop the sustainability and longevity they need to build a product pipeline. She says that to successfully commercialise knowledge, researchers must develop the skills to build solid relationships with multiple research organisations as well as in-house R&D capability.
– Jackie Randles
Click here for Research and industry – A relationships guide (Part 2).
Featured image above: Inspiring Australia supported the development of The Medieval Bundanon, a performance held on the banks of the Shoalhaven River that explored the work of Wollongong based geomorphologist Dr Tim Cohen. Credit: Mark Newsham.
There are many people who don’t know what scientists do or why research matters.
A 2013 CSIRO survey of more than 1,200 people found that only 53% of the respondents reported being interested in science. Around 40% of respondents reported being disengaged and even wary of science, with half of those people found to actively mistrust scientists. This lack of understanding between scientists and those who don’t trust their motives perpetuates a divide.
The general lack of awareness and understanding about the place of science in society is accompanied by poor scientific literacy.
In 2014 the Academy of Science found that large numbers of respondents to a survey of 1500 people answered basic scientific questions incorrectly. For example, only six in ten of respondents knew that the Earth takes one year to orbit the sun. Men, younger people, and those with higher education levels were more likely to know the correct answer: 68% of men knew the Earth takes a year to orbit the sun compared with 50% of women. More than a quarter of survey respondents – 27% – believed that the earliest humans live at the same time as dinosaurs.
These results were broadly similar to a similar survey conducted in 2010. Interestingly, knowledge levels amongst young people dropped more than other groups over the previous three years. For example, there was a 12% reduction in the proportion of 18–24 year-olds who know the earth orbits the sun in a year (down to 62%).
While knowledge of science facts cannot be considered a genuine sign of scientific literacy, it does tell us something. Looking at the 2013 CSIRO data that identified that 40% of the Australian public are disinterested or wary of science, Dr. Craig Cormack conducted focus group studies with this cohort and found some interesting and unexpected common themes:
Nearly all reported a negative experience of science at school.
The word “technology” was more appealing than the word “science”.
People didn’t want to know about how a technology worked – they just wanted to know that it did work, that it was safe, and that it would solve the problem that it was intended for.
When asked who they most trusted to tell them about science or technology, focus group members cited friends, relatives and even talkback radio hosts. They did not refer to scientific experts.
Another survey conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs for Inspiring Australia in 2014 looked at how frequently Australians interacted with information about science and technology. Only half of the population could recall listening to, watching or reading something to do with science and technology, or even searching for science and technology information, at least once a fortnight. And 14% of respondents had much less frequent interactions with science and technology information.
We can assume that large numbers of people continue to be disengaged in science, and that politicians and policy makers are among the scientifically disinterested.
With this in mind, Inspiring Australia encourages scientists from all disciplines and at every level of their careers to help us ensure that more Australians understand and value of what they do.
The story of you
There are three main reasons why we encourage researchers and academics to take the time to develop an interesting story about what they do.
1. It’s good for the community
Sharing stories creates connections. A memorable interaction with you might have a positive impact in someone’s life later on. They may learn something new and be prompted to find out more – this can lead to increased scientific literacy. They may consider going into a STEM career. They may be more inclined to support public funding for the work you do, or talk to other people about how interesting your work is.
Take Lena, a young woman from near Wollongong whose family and school community were convinced that she should be a hairdresser. A chance encounter with an engineering outreach program led her instead to pursue an engineering degree, much to the surprise of everyone she knew. No one in her immediate environment would have made this suggestion. Today Lena is a fourth year honours student at UNSW Engineering. If there were 100 other young women in a similar position as Lena, and if one in 10 had the same response as she did, Australia would have ten new female engineers.
As why this is important, a serious STEM skills shortage has been identified in Australia. The problem begins at school, with Australia lagging in maths and science on many international benchmarks. Gender equity is also an ongoing issue, with fewer women pursuing STEM degrees than men. Each time researchers discuss their work with non-scientists, they provide role models for young people and their advisers.
2. It’s good for science
Researchers have an important role to play in helping improve awareness of Australia’s research capability. While research and academia are at the heart of Australia’s innovation agenda, scientists are not yet prominently featured alongside entrepreneurs and start-ups in public discourse. There’s an opportunity for academics and researchers to make much more noise about the research and teaching that goes on in universities. This is where Australia’s capability in science, technology, engineering and maths is developed. PWC reports that if just 1% of the workforce moved into a STEM role, Australia could boost its GDP by $57.4 billion dollars. Academic work is crucial in developing talent and skills.
3. It’s good for you
New opportunities unfold when you meet people from other sectors and get involved in new things. This sounds like more work – and it is. But the benefits are worth the effort. There’s huge value in developing new networks; it gets your name out there, you receive more invitations to participate in interesting initiatives and it can be good fun. Universities are also beginning to reward academics and researchers who become advocates and role models by speaking to the public.
Who could you talk to and why?
If you wanted to talk about your scientific research to a broader audience, what would you want to achieve as a result of this communication? It’s important to have a clear purpose on what you hope to achieve as this will guide what you decide to do.
Ask yourself these questions – in this order – to help shape the next steps.
Who could you talk to? And why them?
What do you think they might be interested to know?
What could you say to them?
How would this communication help you fulfill your purpose?
There’ll probably be different kinds of audiences you’d like to reach, so you’ll need to develop slightly different approaches. Each audience and what they might be interested in should guide your content. What would be the main thing you’d want a particular audience to remember about your work? ONE big idea. Consider this before you craft your message so you can talk about something the audience is likely to be interested in.
What’s a point of common interest you could start from? Physicist Professor Brian Greene, who founded the World Science Festival in New York, talks about building bridges. He says you need to engage people with familiar concepts before you take them somewhere very new.
Astronomer Dr Amanda Bauer suggests you treat people as if they are intelligent and curious – they may not have an in depth knowledge about your topic, but they are interested to learn. And when your enthusiasm for your work shows, the audience will be inspired to find out more. They may not understand everything you’re talking about, but they will enjoy hearing you express a point of view with passion – even if it’s a controversial.
Personal anecdotes are another way of making a story more memorable and interesting. As does any information that shows the human side of being a scientist – disappointment, setbacks, mistakes and unexpected twists. Dr Jordan Nyguen’s two-part Catalyst program ‘Becoming Superhuman’ was really effective in showing how technology doesn’t always work as it’s supposed to. It’s reassuring for an audience to know that you don’t have all the answers.
Make your story simple enough for someone not only to remember it, but to also be able to tell someone else. Limit yourself to one big idea and no more than 3 points. Invite audience participation via questions. Consider using a prop – stick insects are always good – or even a rock. Professor Kathy Belov takes baby devils to her talks.
Finish your talk with a call to action and something that the audience can do afterwards. This is another great way to keep the engagement going.
Once you’ve got a story to tell, practice it!
Notice your body language by doing your talking in front of a mirror. Performance coaches recommend adopting a stately posture to combat nerves and even feeling your voice in your whole body. Your voice is stronger when it comes from your belly rather than your throat, and your words should be aimed towards the back of the space you are in. If you record yourself speaking, you’ll notice where your voice might need to be modulated. Or where sentences are too long and need to be shortened to accommodate your breath.
Get help crafting your story
Talking about yourself does not come naturally to everyone, but these skills can be developed and there are people who can help. Most universities have professional staff and science communicators who provide advice and training for academics.
If you want to try your hand at media, a good way to start is by developing an 800 word article for the Conversation or for publication on your university’s website. Once your article is published, you can send it to the local community radio station. Regional radio is another great avenue for honing your media skills. Staff in your university’s media team will be able to advise the best course of action.
Dr Cameron Webb is a Medical Entomologist at the University of Sydney and NSW Health Pathology who makes regular media appearances. He understands how the media works and recommends anyone interested in doing media interviews should first listen to the radio a lot to understand how journalists package information.
Note what you like and dislike about others being interviewed. Listen to how people respond to different types of questions. Cameron also advises you keep track of all your media activity to build a showcase of your ability to promote science – a valuable skill to note in job applications, requests for promotion and grant applications.
There are lots of online resources available to help you pitch a story and make it newsworthy, prepare for a media interview and build useful relationships with journalists. For starters, look at sciencemediasavvy.org and scijourno.com.au.
Talk to the public
Once you’ve got a story to tell, get out there! Make contact with the people who deliver events and public programs at your university and let them know you are keen to talk to the public.
Start with your institution’s open day. National Science Week is another great opportunity for researchers to connect with the general public and many libraries also welcome talks from scientists. It’s best to approach someone who might host you with an idea that is well developed rather than a vague interest in wanting to get some communication experience. Have a title, event description, target audience and few lines about why this topic may pique interest, and with whom.
Participate in panel discussions. Get involved in a science pub night. Join the audiences on ABC’s Q and A. Get out of your bubble! Share your story with people outside your peer network and you might be surprised to see how interested they are when you take some time to let them in.
– Jackie Randles, Manager Inspiring Australia (NSW)
Inspiring Australia works with scientists around the country to create memorable events and activities designed to engage everyday people with science, technology and innovation. Programs include theatrical performances, citizen science, community festivals and artistic collaborations that bring science and technology to life and tell intriguing stories about the amazing things that scientists do.
This is an edited version of a keynote presentation delivered to the 2016 Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education on the theme: The 21st Century Science and Maths Graduate. The Conference was held on 28–29 September 2016 in Brisbane at the University of Queensland.
The employment prospects of science graduates are called into question by a report published by the Grattan Institute.
Studying science will get you a job – just not the job you might expect.
Industry and high placed academics have decried the results of a report declaring science to be a ‘high risk’ degree.
Such results fail to represent career prospects for those working outside of traditional science roles, say a cohort of Australia’s leading science experts.
Last week the respected Grattan Institute think tank’s Mapping Higher Education report warned that science was a ‘high risk’ study choice and that many recent science and information technology graduates are failing to find full-time work.
It’s not wrong, but it is near-sighted, say university and industry experts.
The report, released last week, concludes that a bachelor science degree is “high risk for finding a job” with “poor employment outcomes”, warning 51% of science graduates looking for full-time work in 2015 had found it four months after completing their course, 17 percentage points lower than the national average.
But thinking of science as a one-track path to the lab fails to take into account the broader benefits of a science degree, says Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science, Greg Hunt.
Professor Les Field, Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor of UNSW Australia and Secretary for Science Policy at the Australian Academy of Science, says STEM-based education gives students a “versatile, flexible, problem-solving, technology-literate grounding, which is what you need for life and employment in the modern world”.
Science graduates have higher rates of employment
The Chief Scientist’s March 2016 report, Australia’s STEM workforce, shows that over the medium term, people with STEM qualifications have higher rates of employment than graduates from other disciplines, Field points out.
“A survey of 466 employers across various sectors [STEM Skills in the workforce: What do employers want? March, 2015] have also shown that many employers expect to employ many more STEM graduates over the next five to 10 years, and around a quarter are already struggling to recruit people with appropriate STEM qualifications,” says Field.
“There is some mismatch between employer requirements of STEM graduates and the skills and experience with which they are coming out of universities. We should advocate that more industry placements and internships form a stronger part of university education.”
“Not a lot of opportunities”
Zara Barger, a first-year biomedical engineering student at the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) admits that she is “a little worried” about her prospects. “In Australia it seems as though there is not a lot of opportunities. As part of my degree I have to do two 6-month internships and I think that will give me insight and connections.”
Alecia Newton, a UTS Bachelor of Science student, agrees. “I’m a little bit concerned. I’m planning on getting some experience by volunteering so fingers crossed that will get me a job. But science is a good starting ground – it will give me good knowledge and if it doesn’t work out I will do a Masters in high school teaching,” she says.
Grattan report “surprising”
“It’s surprising to see the Grattan Institute’s claims that are contrary to other reports both here and overseas,” says Jackie Randles, state manager for Inspiring Australia, the Federal Government’s national strategy for engaging communities in STEM.
“The World Economic Forum estimates that 65% of children entering primary school today will ultimately end up working in completely new job types that don’t yet exist. By 2020, more than a third of the core skill sets of most occupations will be those that are not yet considered crucial today and likely to involve STEM,” says Randles.
“Closer to home, Australia’s STEM skills shortage continues to be a major risk to our economy with business joining government and academics in calls to redress a worrying skills gap.”
Graham Durant, Director of Questacon, the National Science and Technology Centre, says graduates with a “good science degree and a balanced portfolio of skills, knowledge and abilities will continue to have good employment prospects but not necessarily as academic researchers.
“The STEM disciplines, including art and design provide very good training for the world of work but degrees should not be regarded as vocational training. A good background in STEM disciplines opens up many opportunities in careers that may not necessarily be regarded as STEM careers.”
Professor Merlin Crossley, Deputy Vice-Chancellor of Education at UNSW and former Dean of Science agrees that the longer term prospects for science graduates are excellent.
“With slightly more people studying science, obviously slightly fewer people will get jobs at once. Science still provides opportunities – all doors remain open to science graduates.”