Tag Archives: critical minerals

Sounding the alarm on Australia’s future workforce

– By Anna-Maria Arabia OAM

The Australian Academy of Science has sounded an alarm that policymakers can no longer afford to ignore. Its landmark Australian Science, Australia’s Future: Science 2035 report identifies 8 critical science domains where gaps in workforce, infrastructure and coordination will cripple our ability to meet future challenges: agricultural science, AI, biotechnology, climate science, data science, epidemiology, geoscience, and materials science.

The diagnosis is sobering. The prescription demands urgent attention from those who shape higher education policy.

A vision of science in 2035

Read the report, Australian science, Australia’s future: Science 2035. Image: Australian Academy of Science.

Why does the Science 2035 report matter? Because capability gaps are not just a skills problem, they are a sovereignty problem.

Since 1990, 90% of global technological advancement has been rooted in fundamental science, yet Australia has spent decades allowing its STEM workforce to be determined haphazardly.

We are now at risk of compromising our ability to adequately respond to climate disruption, the critical minerals transition, or the AI revolution.

A nation that cannot generate its own scientific knowledge or secure diverse international research collaborators, becomes dependent on others to solve its problems, a dependency fraught with risk in a volatile world.

Future workforce needs

The report unambiguously shows that a critical misalignment persists: the current pipeline and study choices of students are not aligned with the needs of our future workforce. And declining STEM participation, shortages of in-field teachers, and unfocused international STEM mobility threaten national capability.

Fixing this requires active intervention: curriculum signalling; targeted incentives for students entering priority disciplines; alignment of workforce and immigration policy objectives; and partnerships between universities and industry to make career pathways visible and attractive well before students reach Year 12.

Universities are Australian assets

This is precisely where Australian universities must be understood as unique and strategic national assets, not credential factories. Universities can do something that no technical training program can replicate: they deliver research-led education.

When a student is taught by a practicing researcher working at the frontier of geoscience or epidemiology, they do not merely learn what is known, they learn how knowledge is created and challenged. That depth is exactly what the public and private sectors need when it confronts problems that have no established answers.

Industries that employ PhD graduates derive significant adaptive capacity from these employees through improved innovation, advanced problem-solving, and the ability to navigate complex, data-driven environments. And we know innovative industries are profitable and productive ones too.

The future with AI

A purely technical training response to the Science 2035 findings would be a mistake. Training people to operate today’s tools prepares them for yesterday’s challenges.

The AI landscape of 2035 will not be navigated by graduates taught only to use current software, it will be shaped by graduates who understand the underlying mathematics and can innovate when those tools evolve or become obsolete. Research-led science education builds that adaptability.

Follow the roadmap

The Science 2035 report gives policymakers something rare: a map of what needs to be done, backed by evidence. The response must match that ambition.

Sustained investment in university research and research-led teaching is not a cost, it is the essential infrastructure on which Australia’s future standard of living depends.

Anna-Maria Arabia OAM
Visiting Fellow, Australian National University
Former Chief Executive of the Australian Academy of Science (Oct 2016 to April 2026)

Image: Australian Academy of Science

Read more from Australian University Science:

Mining the gap: how universities must forge the critical minerals workforce

At the same time as Australia is poised to take advantage of soaring demand for critical minerals, our mining workforce could be facing a critical shortage.

The Australian Academy of Science flagged geoscience as one of 8 key areas projected to grow in demand in its 2025 policy report. But it faces a weak pipeline, according to the report, with dropping university enrolments and rising workforce shortages.

Several universities have closed their earth sciences departments, and the workforce is projected to age as well as shrink. But leading work at the University of Tasmania (UTas) and Curtin University shows how Australia could attract a new wave of students – and shape them into the future mining workforce.

It’s more than coal, oil and gas

Greenish blue rocks
An ore containing nickel. Image: Shutterstock.

One major challenge for the mining industry is attracting local geology talent. “If you go to most mine sites around Australia, you will find that there’s a whole lot of geologists from overseas on short-term or long-term visas,” says Sebastien Meffre, Head of Earth Sciences at the University of Tasmania.

But the field seems to have passed rock bottom, for now. This year, enrolments in geosciences have started to increase again at UTas, with more postgraduate and student professionals filling gaps in courses left behind by undergraduates.

The mining industry’s shift in focus to critical minerals has made a big difference, according to Meffre. The industry is no longer associated purely with coal, oil, and gas, but with the elements needed to make solar panels and batteries.

“The role of critical minerals for not just the prosperity and economic development of Australia, but also as a way of addressing the climate transition – those conversations have been extremely helpful for us,” says Meffre.

Balancing boom-and-bust

In Western Australia, the turnaround happened earlier, with enrolments trending up from the early 2020s. Martin Van Kranendonk, Head of the School of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Dean of Science at Curtin University, says they now have record-high numbers of geoscience students. He sees this uptick as part of one of the boom-and-bust cycles so familiar to the mining industry.

“I think the challenge for university departments has been: how do we ride those waves?”

Van Kranendonk’s answer is diversity in teaching. Students at Curtin can combine geoscience with subjects like environmental science or planetary science, allowing them to turn their skills to the space industry or mine site rehabilitation if the mineral markets change.

UTas has taken a similar path, with opportunities to combine geoscience with a raft of other subjects, such as environmental science, palaeontology, and engineering. Meffre says students don’t always realise they have these options when they start studying. “It requires conversations with students at the first year level in order for them to take the right units in order to get there.”

“If we can provide diverse pathways, then we hope that we can keep our student numbers up and continue to be viable and continue to have meaning for the community,” says Van Kranendonk.

Two students looking at geological features
Choosing the right location to study matters in geology, reflecting the surrounding environment and the skills developed. Image: Shutterstock.

Learning across landscapes: cross-institutional opportunities

Meffre believes cross-institutional teaching is going to be a key part of the future of geosciences. Students might make up some of their course credits by going interstate for an intensive course during teaching breaks, gaining key skills from another institution and learning in a totally different geological environment.

Van Kranendonk agrees. “We can’t all do everything, so the ability to go and find additional resources or training that might suit your interests elsewhere is fantastic.”

Wherever they’re learning – and location matters very much in geology – students must get a more holistic view of the environment and how it intersects with geology and mining.

“People now can really feel good about going into geoscience because it is providing benefit to community,” says Van Kranendonk.